From apprentice to lead, building the research practice behind Life Beautified

Life Beautified helps low-income students fund college through 529 savings plans while building real work skills. Across two phases I went from apprentice, doing the foundational desk research, to lead, running a five-person team, and built the research operations that kept every study moving.

Life Beautified
Role

UXR Apprentice (Phase 1) to Lead UX Researcher (Phase 2)

Client

Life Beautified (via Tech Fleet)

Timeline

Jun 2023 to Jan 2024

Methods

Secondary research, screeners, 8+ in-depth interviews, 5 usability tests, ResearchOps

Apprentice → Lead UXR Interviews Usability Testing ResearchOps
TL;DR

In Phase 1, my secondary research established the problem space: most families have never heard of a 529 plan, and the students who need them most are the least likely to encounter one. In Phase 2, I led a team of five through district scoping, screeners, 8+ in-depth interviews, and five usability tests, and built the end-to-end workflow for recruitment, consent, scheduling, and incentives that made that pace sustainable.

01
Context

A savings tool for the families least likely to know it exists

Life Beautified set out to give students from low-income households a way to earn supplementary income toward a 529 college savings account while gaining work experience. Think Rakuten, but the reward goes to college savings instead of a checking account. Its users sit at the intersection of two hard problems: financial literacy and college access.

Before designing anything, the team needed to understand who these students and families actually are, what they know about paying for college, and whether the core premise, earn, save, learn, matched how they live.

02
Approach

Desk research first, then the families themselves

01

Secondary research (Phase 1).

Synthesized federal, NCES, and Pew data on low-income students, 529 plans, and the digital divide to frame the problem before recruiting anyone.

02

Screeners & recruiting.

Qualified parents in the DMV metro area, household income $30k to $99k, who expect their children to attend college.

03

In-depth interviews.

Generative sessions via UserInterviews.com, Zoom, and Google Meet, exploring feelings about saving for college, 529 awareness, and openness to affiliate marketing.

04

Usability testing.

Five sessions on the design team's prototypes to check whether the concept was understandable to real families.

05

ResearchOps.

A five-person team running studies in parallel needed a shared system, and we didn't have one. With very little budget, I sourced affordable tools and built a standardized way to capture and organize responses, with recruitment, consent, scheduling, and incentives on one tracked pipeline.

ResearchOps — one shared pipeline ResearchOps pipeline: recruit screener, consent form, calendar booking, tracked incentive log, feeding a shared repository running five parallel studies
Figure 01. The shared system that let five researchers run studies in parallel. Redrawn from the project's working files for legibility.
03
What we learned

Parents are the gatekeepers, and they feel lost

Rising costs, no clear goal.

Parents worry about affording tuition but hold no concrete savings target. 'I don't think college is getting cheaper anytime soon,' said the father of a 12-year-old.

They don't know how much to save, or whether a 529 fits.

'Is this the right tool for her? What if she doesn't go to a state school?' asked the mother of 16- and 11-year-olds.

529s feel like a maze of rules.

'There just seems to be so many restrictions, so many rules around it.' This mirrors the Phase 1 finding that most families have never heard of a 529.

Parents are saving to buy their kids choices.

'My goal is that they can make choices for their education, not based on budget or loans,' said the mother of 9- and 7-year-olds.

The concept resonated, with conditions.

'I love that they would gain financial literacy and communication skills.' But parents worried about a child's motivation and the right age, and expected to stay involved.

"My goal is that they can make choices for their education based on what feels right to them, and not based on budget or loans."
Parent participant, in-depth interview
04
Going deeper

Two language gaps that shaped the product

'Influencer,' not 'affiliate marketer.'

Few parents knew the term 'affiliate marketing,' but they instantly recognized the concept through social-media influencers. The product's language had to follow them.

Everyday brands as the mental model.

Parents assumed the product worked with stores they already use, especially Amazon, Walmart, and Target, pointing the partnership and onboarding strategy toward familiar names.

A literacy pattern in the screener.

Across 20 respondents, younger and higher-educated parents were more familiar with 529s, while older parents and those without higher education were less likely to know one, a clear signal about who needs the most education.

05
Impact

Direction the product team could build on

Reframed the product around the whole family.

Lead with trust, plain-language education, and visible proof that savings are growing.

Made the dashboard the trust engine.

Simple charts showing balance trends, because parents asked to see 'what she has earned in a given month' and whether it's 'trending up.'

Designed for motivation.

Badges, Duolingo-style reminders, and light gamification to keep student users engaged, addressing the biggest parental concern.

Set the language and brand strategy.

'Influencer' over 'affiliate marketing,' and everyday brands (Amazon, Walmart, Target) featured first.

Fed the next cycle.

Findings revised the personas and user stories and shaped the usability-testing protocol for the design prototypes.

Prototype — key screens
Life Beautified homepage screen

Family-centered homepage

529 onboarding screen

Plain-language 529 onboarding

Savings dashboard screen

Savings growth made visible

Figure 02. Key screens from the prototype the research shaped: a family-centered homepage, a plain-language 529 onboarding flow, and a dashboard that makes savings growth visible.
06
Limitations

How far these findings stretch

A deliberate slice of one metro.

We recruited parents in the DMV area with household incomes between $30k and $99k who expect their children to attend college. That focus was the point, but findings about awareness and trust shouldn't be stretched to other regions or income bands without another look.

The student's voice is secondhand.

The interviews centered on parents, and parents named their child's motivation as their biggest concern. How students themselves respond to earning toward a 529 deserves its own dedicated study.

Twenty screener responses make a lead, and only a lead.

The link between age, education, and 529 familiarity came from 20 screener respondents. It's a useful signal for targeting education content, and it would need a proper survey before anyone treats it as a market fact.

Usability tests measured understanding.

Five sessions told us families could follow the concept and where the language lost them. Whether they'd sign up, stay engaged, and keep saving is a post-launch question the team still has to answer.

07
Reflection

What this project taught me

Research operations are what make insight possible at pace. The shared pipeline was the least glamorous thing I built on this project, and it's the first thing I'd rebuild anywhere else: once recruitment, consent, scheduling, and incentives lived in one place, five researchers could run studies in parallel without losing track of participants or findings.

And with a sensitive, vulnerable audience, the most useful finding was a reframe: the student is the user, but the parent is the gatekeeper. Designing for trust between them mattered more than any single feature.

Read another case study